In addition to 15 or so years of digi-pics that could stand to have their resolution enhanced (so people can scan-and-pan on 8K monitors.)įrom what I've seen the current incarnation of A.I. I have an archive of family photos, dating back to over 100 years ago, and I want to futureproof them so they will look as good as possible on 4K (and 8K) monitors. It sounds like your use case is closer to mine. One day I will be able to upsize my current smartphane and camera images (now 10-16 MP) to look acceptable on future 8K monitors.

No magic, but still quite an improvement. GIGAPIXEL upsizing some old 1K (to 4K) images they now look 'acceptable' on my 4K 32' monitor.

I was hoping that Topaz was correct with the 'Do you wish.' claim.ĭunno about smartphone to 100MP images :-), but after A.I. I don't have lousy smartphone images I have pristine Pixel 2 images that compare favorably with images made from my crop ILCs.

Gigapixel but none of my computers have a suitable video card so I'm relying on third party evaluations before I spend money to upgrade my computer. It won't make a lousy smart phone image into a 100mp middle format shot, if that's whay you mean.Įxactly - won't stop some complaining when it doesn'tĭo you wish that pictures taken with your smartphone had higher quality? A.I.Gigapixel™ can transform them into 100MP size and 16-bit quality that looks like it could only have come from a DLSR cameraĪs I've mentioned elsewhere on this thread, I'm very interested on A.I. I see a very definite relationship between original image quality and results - once again, making big prints needs solid technique and good glass It doesn't give you a free pass from the photographic factors that make for a great looking and interesting print at 12 feet with a much higher MP camera.Ī good sharp image it'll enhance just fine.

Topaz ai gigapixel review